The Racovian Catechism (Pol.: Katechizm Rakowski) is a nontrinitarian statement of faith from the 16th century. The title Racovian comes from the publishers, the Polish Brethren, who had founded a sizeable town in Raków, Kielce County, where the Racovian Academy and printing press was founded by Jakub Sienieński in 1602.
Several authors had a hand in drafting the Catechism: Valentinus Smalcius, Hieronim Moskorzowski, Johannes Völkel and others. It is likely that some of the text had been prepared by the Italian exile Fausto Sozzini, who had settled among the Polish Brethren in 1579, without ever formally joining, and who died in the year before the Catechism was drafted. Despite his lack of any official status in the church Sozzini had been influential in bringing the Polish church round to a Christology which closely resembled what he had learnt from his uncle Lelio Sozzini in exile in Switzerland as a young man.
The Racovian Catechism was published in 1605, and subsequently translated into other languages. Smalcius produced a German version.
The Ecclesia Minor survived in Poland until 1656 when it was outlawed by the Polish Sejm in the Roman Catholic Counter-Reformation. These nontrinitarians, and their Catechism, would later become known as Socinians due to the prominence given to Fausto Sozzini's writings after his death in the series Bibliotheca Fratrum Polonorum published in Amsterdam 1665 and widely circulated in England and elsewhere.
On April 2, 1652 The English Parliament voted to seize and burn all copies circulating.
A revised Latin edition of the Racovian catechism appeared in 1680 in Amsterdam, revised by Sozzini's grandson Andrzej Wiszowaty Sr. and great-grandson Benedykt Wiszowaty. This was the base of Thomas Rees' 1818 English translation.
- Section One - Of the Holy Scriptures
- Chapter 1: Of the Authenticity of the Holy Scriptures
- Chapter 2: Of the Sufficiency of the Holy Scriptures
- Chapter 3: Of the Perspicuity of the Holy Scriptures
- Section Two - Concerning the way of Salvation
- Chapter 1: The Reasons of the Revelation of the Way of Salvation
- Chapter 2: Concerning those Things which constitute the Way of Salvation
- Section Three - Of the knowledge of God
- Chapter 1: Of the Nature of God
- Chapter 2: Of the Will of God
- Section Four - Of the Knowledge of Christ
- Chapter 1: Of the Person of Christ
- Section Five - Of the Prophetic Office of Christ
- Chapter 1: Of the Precepts of Christ which he added to the Law
- Chapter 2: Of the Precepts of Christ delivered by him separately
- Chapter 3: Of the Baptism of Water
- Chapter 4: Of the Breaking of the Holy Bread
- Chapter 5: Of the Promise of Eternal Life
- Chapter 6: Of the Promise of the Holy Spirit
- Chapter 7: Of the Confirmation of the Divine Will
- Chapter 8: Of the Death of Christ
- Chapter 9: Of Faith
- Chapter 10: Of Free Will
- Chapter 11: Of Justification
- Section Six - Of the Priestly Office of Christ
- Section Seven - Of the Kingly Office of Christ
- Section Eight - Of the Church of Christ
- Chapter 1: Of the Visible Church
- Chapter 2: Of the Government of the Church of Christ
- Chapter 3: Of the Discipline of the Church of Christ
- Chapter 4: Of the Invisible Church
The most distinctive element in Socinian, as opposed to Arian, Christology is the rejection of the personal pre-existence of Christ. The theme of Christ's preexistence occurs repeatedly in the Racovian Catechism, with detailed discussion of disputed verses, such as:
- "In the Beginning was the Word" John 1:1 – The explanation is given, taken from Lelio Sozzini's Brief explanation of John Chapter 1 1561 (and developed in Fausto Sozzini's later work of the same name), that the Beginning refers to the Beginning of the Gospel, not the old creation.
- "Before Abraham was I am" John 8:58 – is treated that the ego eimi refers to "I am" before "Abraham becomes" (future) many nations in the work of Christ.
- "[I] came down from heaven" John 6:38 – is related to being "born of the Virgin"
- That Christ was literally dead in the grave for three days – as a proof of Christian mortalism, resurrection and the humanity of Christ.
The personal devil
The Racovian Catechism makes muted reference to the devil in seven places which prompts the 1818 translator Thomas Rees, to footnote references to the works of Hugh Farmer (1761) and John Simpson (1804). Yet these references are in keeping with the somewhat subdued handling of the devil in the Biblioteca Fratrum Polonorum. The Collegia Vicentina at Vicenza (1546) had questioned not only the existence of the devil but even of angels.
- 1608 German by Valentinus Smalcius
- 1652 English version printed Broer Jansz, Amsterdam, attributed to John Biddle whose own "Twofold Catechism" 1654
- 1659 Dutch version (paraphrase) Collegiants
- 1666 Dutch version (official)
- 1680 revised Latin Edition by Benedykt Wiszowaty, Amsterdam.
- 1818 English: The Racovian Catechism of 1605 A Sketch of the History of Unitarianism in Poland and the adjacent countries. Thomas Rees, F.S.A. London: Printed for Longman
- The Racovian Catechism, with Notes and Illustrations Rees Thomas 1818 "Wissowatius revised the text, and introduced into it most of the emendations suggested by ... Besides these, several other notes from the pen of his learned nephew Benedict Wissowatius are likewise inserted here,"
- Wulfert De Greef The writings of John Calvin: an introductory guide 2008 "Lelio Sozzini's Brevis explicatio in primum Johannis caput appeared in 1561, which marked the beginning of the Socinian phase among the Italian exiles"
- p.64 1818 edition
- pp68-69 1818 edition
- pp150 1818 edition
- pp165-166 1818 edition
- "attributed to the devil" p.7, "destroy hell and death, and the devil who held the empire of death" 162, "principally the devil, the author and active promoter of temptations" 188, quoting Paul 193, "those who detain him are sin, the world, the devil, and death" 314, "gave them up to the power of Satan" 346, quoting Paul "not a novice, lest he fall under the temptation of the devil" 374, in 1818 edition)
- e.g. Walter Scott in The existence of evil spirits proved: and their agency argued that even Socinus and Crellius did not suspect otherwise, but can only marshall (p.23) little more than an example of Crell quoting Paul
- Earl Morse Wilbur Ch.20