Talk:Razor and blades model
|This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Razor and blades model article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
|WikiProject Marketing & Advertising||(Rated Stub-class, Mid-importance)|
|The contents of the Free gift page were merged into Razor and blades model on September 2012. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see ; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page.|
This page is archived by ClueBot III.
Comcast / Cable TV DVR Example not relevant
Currently, one of the examples of this business model is Cable TV companies selling DVRs as a subscription "service" instead of as a one-time sale. This is more like an example of a rental model, where you rent equipment, and after a year or two, the monthly rental fee becomes greater than the cost of the product if you had bought it outright, but is NOT a good example of a Razor and Blades business model, because you aren't trying to lock in a customer to a secondary consumable product that is required. You would maybe argue that cable TV service is the secondary product, but that can be bought and consumed completely independently of the DVR, so I see no reason that example should even be in this article. It's just plain wrong. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 126.96.36.199 (talk) 15:15, 15 March 2018 (UTC)
Difference between "Applications" section and "Specific Examples"?
There is an "Applications" sections, and then underneat that, there is an "Issues" section which appears to have a sub-section called "Specific Examples", which I think maybe is supposed to be examples not of the business model in general, but of the issue of loss of vendor-lock in causing the model to start to lose profitability, but then, within that section, it looks like there are just general examples of the business model. So, the division of sections seems confused, and the purpose and relationship of the sections and subsections is not clear. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.8.131.52 (talk) 15:24, 15 March 2018 (UTC)
A gift knitting row counter given away by Woman's Weekly
- Agreed, this is a poor example. Although the row counter is useful to knitters, it doesn't require ongoing purchases. I am removing it. --Macrakis (talk) 16:23, 28 May 2018 (UTC)